You were directed to this page because you received membership from Rochester L.A.W. See bottom for extra bonus
Please download your free gift for signiing up with us. This is a transcript from Jack Smith on the HISTORY OF MILITARY LAW. It is very informative and applicable to what we are studying. To save to your hard drive press here We have more free gifts on our catalog
History of Military Law
The first major maxim of law is that the government is usually always right.
Today most people do not understand who they are and how to apply the Constitution to their lives. However the Constitution is alive and well, it is living in America.
The Constitution of the Common Law is dead from a National point of view, but from an Individual point, the Constitution is alive and well living in America and you can access it on an individual basis if you understand how it applies to you, if you understand who you are (your character, if you have the right character), and if you understand the procedure to access the remedies that are available to you through the Constitution
The second major maxim of law that most patriots are wrong most all of the time.
Not because they aren’t waking up, not because they are not trying to learn the truth, but it’s what they don’t know and don’t understand that gets them into trouble. Not what they do. Because as soon as they learn a little bit, they’re anxious to go out into the courts everywhere and explain how intelligent and how knowledgeable they are. That’s what gets you in trouble and the absolute reversal of the results you intend every time. You are not going to go into those courts and show them how eloquent you can ARGUE the issues of the case. THAT WILL GET YOU DEFEATED EVERY TIME.
The third maxim of law is if you thought about things or did things just ass backwards from what the average person thinks, you have more of an opportunity of being correct than wrong.
That comes from Scripture that says that there is a wide path that leads in commerce in the city and destruction and a very narrow and winding path to truth that gets you to where you’re supposed to be going.
DEMOCRACY VERSUS REPUBLIC IN THE UNITED STATES
Everybody that takes an Oath of allegiance to the flag of the United States, oath of allegiance to the Republic and the flag for which it stands. But then we read in the newspaper, listen to the radio and the TV, listen to government speakers and they tell us continuously that it’s a DEMOCRACY, DEMOCRACY, DEMOCRACY. They never use the work Republic. What’s the problem here?
Then we listen the Gene Schroder and he that on March 9, 1933 basically four to five days after FDR came into the Presidency there was a law passed by Congress which was an update to the TRADING WITH THE ENEMY ACT of 1917 which declared all US Citizens and State Residents to be enemies of the United States and that created a position in which we lost all of our rights and all of our Constitutional remedies. And that War Powers condition has to be reversed in order to get our freedoms back.
So, many patriots in the last couple of years have been concentrating on what we can do to rid of the War Powers Act and get our rights back. But the question is: If Congress tomorrow were to get rid of the War Powers Act, what would that do in reality for any of us or any of our rights? Would we wake up tomorrow and go into a Traffic court and would we then argue the Constitution? Would all of a sudden the magistrate in that Traffic court then say: Bless you, my children, you have Constitutional rights? Would you like to raise any of them in your argument? THAT WOULD NOT HAPPEN. Stay tuned. Because under the law, the Constitution has nothing to do with Traffic court and it wouldn’t change one iota even if they got rid of the War Powers Act.
The problem we have in this nation went back to the first Monday in December in the year 1860. The last time a Lawful Congress of the United States sat in session was roughly October 20, 1860. If you will recall, Congress adjourned about that time to go home in the year 1860 because there were upcoming elections in November for members of Congress and the Presidency of the United States. You will further remember from studies of history in the Public School system that the Southern Legislatures said that if A. Lincoln came became President that personal and private feelings were such that the Southern states said they would secede from the Union and they would not send their representatives to Congress. And certainly in the November elections, A. Lincoln was elected President of the United States.
If you look under Article I, Section 4, Clause 2 of the Constitution for the United States, you will find it talks about the date for the assembling of Congress. CONGRESS WILL MEET THE FIRST MONDAY IN DECEMBER. December of 1860 rolled around and the Southern states says: We aren’t coming to Congress. When they did not come to Congress, Congress failed to be in session. A Republican form of government is REPRESENTATIVE. The legislative body is the government. When the legislative fails to come into session when it is supposed to, we go back to the civil essays by John Locke in the 1690s and he says: THE EASIEST WAY TO DISSOLVE GOVERNMENT IS FOR THE HEAD OF THE GOVERNMENT TO GO OUT OF SESSION AND NOT COME BACK. So, when Congress failed to come into session, which the LAW requires them to do—Art. I, Sec. 4, Cl. 2—on the first Monday in December, they failed to come into session—IT DISSOLVED THE GOVERNMENT. Anybody tell you that in high school history? It is a condition called SINE DIE (means the suns sets—the government dissolved itself when Congress failed to come into session).
Now understand how ridiculous that situation is. The Southern states wanted to protect States’ Rights so they did not come into session in Congress; thereby, they dissolved the United States government. This put it in Emergency War Powers condition which dissolved all the rights of all the states. So, by doing the very act to protect their rights, THEY DESTROYED THEIR RIGHTS. Where were the people that were supposed to be following their government representatives? They were supposed to be out there kicking butt saying: You get you ass up to Washington and correct and restore this government—not dissolve it.
What basically happens now is that there is no lawful Congress so there is no Republican form of government. Now get the picture, A. Lincoln who now comes into office and swears an Oath in March of 1861 to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America is an attorney—HE KNOWS THE LAW. He has a higher standard of understanding. He comes in and says: God, I’m supposed to uphold the Constitution—the Constitution created a Republican form of government—Congress didn’t come into session, so it dissolved the government. I took an Oath to uphold a government that’s been dissolved. What is his duties and obligations? If he took an Oath to uphold the Constitution, what does he have to do? HE MUST RESTORE THE GOVERNMENT THAT THE REPRESENTATIVES ABANDONED. How is he going to do that? He is going to go into a Civil Police Action to compel the Southern states to send their representatives back to Congress to restore Congress so that we have a Republican form of government.
Abraham Lincoln has taken a lot of heat. However, it’s the authors personal opinion that Lincoln had a firm goal and a firm understanding of exactly what the legal and lawful problems were. His firm plan and goal was that: No matter what the hell it’s going to take, we are going to get all of the state legislatures back into the District of Columbia, back in the capitol building. We’re going to restore DE JURE lawful government and get us back into the Republic—then we’ll handle our problems. He was probably killed because he wanted to restore a lawful legislative body under the law of the Republic and there were elements behind the scenes that said: We will fare much better off under our private interests if lawful government was never restored. If we could maintain an ongoing martial law Military government in this nation. Walk my way and the President will be a dictator and we can control the President. Now lets go down and find out if those patterns and those presumptions are true.
When Lincoln came into the Presidency in March of 1861 after he took office he then around April 20th or 21st issued his first Executive Order and that order went out to the commanders of the US Army and he said: Use your discretion to implement marital law for the purpose of protecting life and property belonging to the United States. That order is an Executive War Powers order, it came from the President who was the chief executive of the United States of America that had NO LAWFUL GOVERNMENT. He gave that order under emergency War Powers—there was no legislative body to consult. He did it out of necessity. There was no government. The government abandoned the people. But since he had a sworn duty to uphold and carry out the Constitution and he was trying his best to get the government back into session. HE WAS DOING IT AS A KING WITH SUPREME AUHORITY.
There is a rule under martial law that once a Martial Law condition has been declared it can never be terminated unless done so under one of three procedures (these procedures are laid out by John Locke’s civil essays and they’re also laid out in Military government and Military law).
The three methods of terminating Martial law and when martial law kind of devolves into a more easy going thing—we don’t have open military oppression—it is know as Martial Rule which means that there is a military government standing behind an alleged civil form of government which is out front that looks, for all practical purposes, like everything is going on as usual. But the civil government is under the authority of the military standing behind it usually unobserved and unobtrusive. The three ways of terminating Martial Law and Martial Rule are:
For the commander under the Martial Law to openly and publicly declare a termination of Martial Law condition. In this case, it would be the President of the United States. But no president of the United States from the time that the order went down in April of 1861 has ever terminated the Martial Law condition created by the Civil War.
A foreign power comes in and conquerors the military power in the nation. And a head of the foreign power by open declaration terminates the military authority. That has never happened. The only foreign power of today with any authority is the United Nations—they are not about to come into the land, depose the President and announce you guys are all free.
Since martial law rule is not lawful government, the people in the nation by grass roots movement raise up a new government—a lawful government—and it displaces the military government when it’s in full force and effect by right of law. Because the people have an inherent right to form their own g.. Is that not what the Common Law courts and Militias are trying to do? But the problem is that the courts and the militias are a sub-set of a civil authority and when the militia exits without a civil authority and when the Common Law courts exist without a civil authority, they’re not protected.
Therefore, it is put to you, if you are a militia without civil oversight authority claiming legal rights, you’re in no better legal position than the Southern Confederate armies in their argument against President Lincoln with their legal right and authority exist to represent the Southern people. THEY WERE IN REBELLION. Therefore, if you’re going to have a militia and a Common Law court, you had better learn and understand the laws of nations and Nature so that support that militia and support that Common Law court which are subsets of a natural law of government—not independent creatures existing on their own. If you haven’t got the foundation and you’re filling in all of the other goodies, you’re up in the air and you have no law to rest upon, you’re going to be cut down when the winds, the rain, and the weather comes. YOU DON’T WANT TO DO IT WRONG—YOU WANT TO DO IT RIGHT.
Now Lincoln said that the Southern states were in Rebellion—they were Rebels. Was the Civil War a war or a Police Action? Police Action. Why wasn’t it a war? Because a war is conducted between two sovereigns. Let’s analyze the situation. If it was a war in the eyes of Lincoln, then he lied because he said he was committing US troops to protect United States property on the basis that the Southern states had no right of possession. If it’s his legal position that the Southern states had no right of secession, then they are NOT an independent sovereign nation. If they are not an independent sovereign nation, you can’t go to war against them, can you? So, what was it? IT WAS A REBELLION.
What do you do in terms of a Rebellion? If you have a husband beating up on a wife in a house, do you send down a war party to take out the house, capture the house, and destroy the inhabitants and destroy the house for the country that sent the war party down? Or do you send a Police force out to separate the belligerents, cool the situation down, and protect human life and property? And then resolve the issue and get them back into a friendly relationship? Because, after all, they’re citizens and they’re your friends and they’re just a little wacko and you have to get them back on point. The police are not meant to CONQUER the situation, the police are sent to protect human life and property, minimize damage, separate the belligerents, and restore them into law, understanding, resolution.
The goals are different in a Police Action than they are in a War. If we believe Lincoln, his purpose was to restore the Union, treat the Southern states as a people therein as citizens of the United States, as friends, as brothers—bring them back into the legislature, talk out the problem, and restore them to principles of law. Do we have any other Acts and Actions conducted by the North under Lincoln which would substantiate this position? Well, Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, didn’t he?
The Emancipation Proclamation was a War Powers executive action (which means it’s under emergency police powers) and you were told in the Public Fool system that it freed the slaves. Go back and read the Emancipation Proclamation. You may be surprised if you read the fine print that it freed the slaves of the rebels. Who are the rebels? Those who took an allegiance to a foreign, unlawful government—the Confederacy in the eyes of Lincoln. If there was a Southern plantation owner which had not taken allegiance to the Confederate states, he was not a rebel. Question of law: Did the act of the Emancipation Proclamation by Lincoln free the slaves that he held? No. Was the purpose of the Emancipation Proclamation to end slavery? No. The purpose of the Emancipation Proclamation was to issue a law under emergency powers under International law to seize the property of rebels so it could not be used against the United States in terms of commerce to prosecute the Rebellion. If the Emancipation Proclamation was an Executive order based on War Powers, then you would have had treat the slaves under Common Law as property of their masters. If you’re in a war, you owe no payments commercially to your enemy, but then after the war, theoretically, the enemy gets his property back again unless you compensate him for it. If it was a war, after the war did the enemies get their property back? No, they didn’t. Therefore, it wasn’t a war and they weren’t compensated either. Why didn’t they get their properties back? Because it was a punishment under Admiralty/Maritime law through the Rebellion. The Emancipation Proclamation was a letter of Marque and Reprisal.
A letter of Marque and Reprisal comes under International law and is what happens when somebody in Rebellion to the law. You seize their property because of their rebellion. Anybody happen to notice the day that the IRS first claims that you’re a “tax-protestor” then they come in and seize your property and they don’t follow the Common Law. They don’t go to court and get permission now do they? Has anybody noticed that in Waco, Ruby Ridge, and Montana there are no Common Law procedures of warrants supported by affidavits of Probable Cause. Because these actions are NOT under domestic Constitutional law, they are under International Law and every one of these areas have first been declared to be a Cult occupying a Compound. These are key words bringing the action under International Law under emergency War Powers so that it is not a Common Law action, it is an Admiralty/Maritime military proceedings and when is the last time you heard that the military had to go to court to get a warrant to carry out their acts? What they have done is converted the target into International Law by ASSUMPTION/PRESUMPTION and moved against them under the laws of REBELLION so that it abrogates any necessity for proceedings at Common Law. When they are operating under military authority, THEY ARE OPERATING UNDER COLOR OF LAW.
When we bring our case, the judges admits that he’s under Color of Law. That is not necessarily an admission of guilt. Because if the judge is under military law, Color of Law is how he operates. And it’s his Duty giving rise to an Immunity which is why your Title 42 suits get thrown out of the military courts. However, we’re here today to show you how to bring them back on track so they’re not thrown out. BECAUSE THESE JUDGES HAVE NOT BEEN RULING ILLEGALLY. They have been sliding around you because you don’t know what you’re involved in and can’t argue it correctly.
Lincoln was involved in a Police Action—to put down the Rebels. The Emancipation Proclamation was a declaration, basically, that this was a Police Action and we’re going to take the property away from the Rebels by military seizures—not under Common Law. When you’re under martial law, the Common Law doesn’t apply—International law applies under the laws of Nations. Martial terminates civil government and in this case civil government self destructed with the abandonment of the legislature of the body of Congress. And the President was left with no options other than to rule this country under military government. Never say that Lincoln was the root problem. He might have been able to try and do things including teach the American public what the hell was going on. We weren’t there, so we don’t know. But Lincoln was NOT the problem—Congress was the problem. But more so than that, the people were the problem because there is plenty of case law that says that the duty of the CITIZENS is to keep the government in line and it is NOT the duty of the government to keep the Citizens in line. So, where were all the people who understood anything about government that kept their government in line? The people, out of their ignorance, allowed the Destruction of our Republican, Christian form of government in 1860 without a whimper and without a cry.
When belligerency stops, Martial Law turns into Martial Rule. Civil government under Martial Rule is military government—it’s defined to be a DEMOCRACY. Another name for Democracy is Military government. Where have you been and why have you known? They have been telling you that you’ve been living in a Democracy all of your life. When did you wake up and say: Why do we have a Military government? Understand, another name for Municipal government is Military government. All the cities are run by municipal governments. All your counties are run by municipal governments. When did you wake up and get a clue that the military was leading your government? Smith told you: That maxim of law number 1—the government never does anything wrong They had no authority run this nation by a military government—but they are really doing a good job of it. They are following all the rules and regulations—THEY ARE NOT VIOLATING ONE OF THEM.
Interjection: One of the members went to a hearing for a probation violation on a warrant issuance done by the ATF. They threw out the warrant based on an Affidavit and a Refusal. Foreclosure action—man went into court on a foreclosure with the same affidavit. The judge told him that the attorney was kind of sick and wouldn’t be here today and we’re going to discontinue the action.
We are getting wins in the military courts. The Constitution is alive and well in America. But the problem is: You don’t understand who the hell you are and who the hell they are. And when you go into their military courts, you Traverse right smack into their military proceedings and under Color of Law—which is the law the military practices—you get all the justice the military government is here to give you. And you’re not happy with that. You want to change it. You have to learn how to change the military law BACK INTO THE PROTECTIONS YOU’RE ENTITLED TO. There is a revolution going on. This slavery is coming to an end for God’s people because they’re understanding:
Who they are
Who we are
What we have a right to
How we can compel that remedy as God’s inheritors of the freedom.
Instead of acting like military slaves that’s gone along with this Fraud. GOVERNMENT HAS DONE NO WRONG. They are deep in all kinds of Fraud, but they don’t have to expose the Fraud, they don’t even understand they are in the Fraud. They are ignorant as a post. They think they’re right. But the problem is that they think they’re right and that all of us are wrong because you don’t procedurally know how to educate those people and show them where they’re wrong also. Until we treat our enemy—the ignorant person in government as our friend and teach him the truth—WE ARE NOT GOING TO GET OUR REMEDY!! First of all we have to learn that truth in order to teach that truth. OK?
Civil government under that Martial Rule is military government known as the DEMOCRACY. They have been telling us the truth all the time. What kind of money do you have in a war zone? War script. Commercial Paper. What came in during the Civil War? Greenback Dollars. Now a lot of people stand around and say: Do you think government really understands what you’re saying, Smith? Do you think those people really know what they’re doing or are they ignorant as posts? Obviously, there are some intelligent dudes out there that know exactly what they’re doing because they’re in a position of the military government and they’ve been trained to that level to know how to do their job correctly. So, the amount of truth these people have is enough to do their job right. The person that’s sweeping the floor has been trained to that level so he can sweep the floor without creating a Constitutional Tort. And he doesn’t have a clue as to what’s going on.
Now it even goes up to the higher forms of government. Remember, after the Civil War, we had a series of cases in the US Supreme Court called the “LEGAL TENDER CASES”, didn’t we? And we had two adjudications of the Legal Tender Cases. The first batch, the court went through and said: Duh, we think it’s illegal and unlawful under the Constitution. I don’t think we can have that Greenback paper money.” And then lo and behold, about a year later, they reheard another Legal Tender Case: “Duh, under the emergency War Powers, we don’t see any problem with Commercial paper.” Now, we’re talking the United States Supreme Court justices here, right? We are talking that are well trained in the law and these fellows must have some clue, right? Smith’s opinion is that the first time the court heard the case, they were under the mistaken delusion that the Nation came back into a Constitutional Republic because as a Constitutional Republic YOU CAN’T HAVE COMMERCIAL PAPER CIRCULATING AS A LEGAL TENDER. So, the Supreme Court justices go: “Duh, under the Constitution, Art. I, Sec 10, the states have to operate with Gold and Silver.” But everybody agreed the Feds—District of Columbia—doesn’t have to operate with Gold and Silver. Why don’t they have to have Gold and Silver? Number one, because they are not included under the restrictions of the Constitution. Number two, they are created as an Admiralty/Maritime state—not a Common Law state—for the purpose of buffering us with foreign governments which under Commerce, under International Law is Admiralty/Maritime. So we needed an Admiralty/Maritime agent to deal with any Admiralty/Maritime International Law. So, that’s why they buffered the District of Columbia and set it aside to be a SEPARATE ENCLAVE—it’s not a state. Because all of the States were using Common Law. In that enclave there’s no Common Law. We specifically buffered it and created in Non-Common Law so it could do Admiralty/Maritime International Law. Why would we send them our gold when they're going to send us their Commercial paper? Not there, unequally yoked. So, we have to set up a trade buffer—District of Columbia. So, District of Columbia can operate outside the world of Gold and Silver. It’s not illegal, and it’s not unlawful, and it’s not unconstitutional.
So, the second time the Supreme Court head this, somebody must have come to these geeks and said: “You guys a bunch of dummies, don’t you understand we’re under military law? “We’re not under Constitutional law, we haven’t restored the Constitution, there’s no Republican restoration of this government. You made a perfectly sound judgment under Common Law, but it’s a perfectly idiotic judgment under Martial Law/Rule.” What is Martial Law/Rule? Is it permanent? No. It’s temporary. What was the decision in the second set of Legal Tender Cases? Didn’t they decide that Commercial paper is ok because of its temporary emergency nature? Because the Presumption is: Eventually, after the emergency’s over, we are going to restore the support of gold. Therefore, under the emergency conditions, Commercial paper is ok. Now, I put it to you, these guys that ruled the first time didn’t have a clue. But I think somebody said: “You guys really screwed up, but maybe you didn’t have all the facts before you, but if I were you, I’d rehear this case because we haven’t gone off the emergency yet. And we need to have the provision for martial law or war script to operate during the emergency.” So, the justices go: “My God, did we blow that one. We better rehear the case.”
Now their first decision is under Common Law. It has NEVER been reversed. Their second decision was under Military Law. It has NEVER been reversed. The first decision is applicable law to the Venue of the Republic which can never die. The second decision is applicable law to the Venue to the War Powers District of Columbia. And it’s perfectly applicable in that scenario. Now when you bring a case before the court dealing with Commercial Paper, what are the facts and the venue your case? Has your case been established within the venue of the Republic/Common Law or has your case been established within the venue of Martial Law/War Powers government? BECAUSE THE FACTS IN THE CASE HAVE TO BE DECIDED BEFORE WE APPLY THE LAW OF THE CASE. Do you see why you are probably losing? Because you haven’t stated sufficient facts in you’re pleading to put your scenario of your case in the Proper venue. The court can rule either way depending upon the facts and pleading of the case. Your pleadings are insufficient to state a claim upon which the Common Law venue is going to apply a ruling in this court. Therefore, we will give you the answer under the military ruling—you’re in violation of the war powers Commercial paper—you’re off base. See why you’re losing? It’s not that you don’t understand the law, you don’t understand the venue, you don’t understand whose hearing the case, you don’t understand how to write your pleadings and argue them.
POST CIVIL WAR EVENTS
After the Civil War, Smith stated his opinion was that Lincoln was going to come down and restore full government. To do that, you have to bring the South in as full-restored government. But Lincoln was assassinated. Vice-president Johnson came in and there was high hopes that he was going to throw the military reconstruction on the South and he said no. President Lincoln was elected on his platform so I have to carry out his platform. So, he, during the unexpired term of Lincoln, proceeded to apply the attempt to bring the South back in on a full standard and restore Congress to get us back into a Republican form of government. Didn’t happen. The next President is a General—a military General—Ulysses S. Grant. He chose military reconstruction on the South—martial law, martial rule. Then they said: “We’re going to restore the legislative body of Congress. All you representatives from the Southern states come on back up to the District of Columbia. But to get your credentials to be seated in the Legislature, you have to pass our test of approval.” What Legislative body is this now? Was this Legislative body elected by the people of the States—they’re representatives? Or are they under the authority of the District of Columbia? They are under the authority of the District of Columbia. OK?
Smith is flipping back to a chart in the paperwork. Ask Right Way what chart he is using.
We know that under the law of Nations that to create an Independent nation requires four mandatory elements. In order to create a viable nation, you need to have:
Republican Form of Government
Legislative Department which makes the laws and the rules
Executive Department which carries out the laws and the rules
Judicial Department which adjudicates and discrepancies that occur.
An Independent Treasury which underwrites as a surety or a guarantor of the Acts and Actions of the officials in the three departments of government.
Now a lot of patriots have given a lot of heat to the Constitution of the United States. They said: Oh boy, was that a trap. That was a trap to get the International Bankers and the International Rulers back in on America. It was a real Fraud—we should never have gotten into that. What was the real purpose of the Constitution of the United States? First of all it was an amendment—it did not replace anything. It was an addendum. It added on to all the Foundational items: The Declarations of Resolves, The Declaration of Independence, The Articles of Confederation, etc. What was wrong with the Articles of Confederation? The Articles of Confederation created a Legislative Dept., and Executive Dept., and a Judicial Dept. but it failed to form the Independent Treasury which could guarantee and be a surety to the government officials. Since there was no Second Witness to government, no commercial binding upon which there was a guarantee of performance of the Commercial world.
The nation under the Articles of Confederation needed a Treasury. A commercial binding. In essence, that’s what the Constitution did. Why did the Founding Fathers go into a Constitutional Convention? Because Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin were over in Europe and the nations over there were saying: “You guys are a joke. You can’t collect taxes, you can’t make payments, you can’t uphold contracts, and you can’t bind your officials. You’re going down the tubes. You’re an illusion.” So, the Founding Fathers came back and said: “Oh My God, we went so far, but we didn’t go far enough. We haven’t got the second witness, we need a commercial binding in order to make the authority of these officials not only binding on what they’re going to do but also to give us a remedy if they screw up by way of their bond—the Treasury.” That was the purpose of the Constitution and the Constitution is a treaty that gives us our remedy in our current problems.
A Constitution is a Treaty under International Law. It’s like saying: ”That automobile created all my problems.” NO—the automobile is a tool. It’s there for a remedy or it’s there for a curse. BUT YOU CONTROL THE TOOL. The Constitution is a tool. It’s not a curse and it’s not a blessing. We understand why it is that it can be either a remedy or it can be the worst thing that ever hit you. BUT BY YOUR KNOWLEDGE, YOU’RE GOING TO USE THAT TOOL EITHER TO BRING YOURSELF INTO A RESTORATION OF YOUR RIGHTS AND THE RESTORATION OF THE DAMAGE DONE TO YOU OR YOU ARE GOING TO, OUT OF IGNORANCE, NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT IT IS AND THEREFORE BE UNABLE TO USE ITS BENEFITS.
The Republican form of government had three DEPARTMENTS. When the Legislative Dept. which was established under Art. I Sec. 4, Cl. 2 went out of existence, the Republican form of government went out of existence. But, you say we still had a building where Congress met. In fact, during the War the Northern Congress came into session. The only problem is that they don’t represent everybody and they are not a full quorum so they can’t conduct business. Not only that, since they didn’t come into session at the proper time, it’s too late. Therefore, they’re not lawful government. Well, who the hell are they? They were Advisor to the President. An advisor to the President? Yes.
So, we still had the Supreme Court sitting there, didn’t we? Excuse me, you don’t have a Republican form of government anymore. Civil government has gone down the drain. So, the Judicial Dept. of government ceased to exist also. What are they now? A military court martial advisory tribunal to the President.
What is a DEMOCRACY? It has three branches of one military government. Who’s the head of the military government? Chief Executive officer—President of the Untied States. What does the Legislative branch of that military government do? Advises the President and his officials as to military policy. Who has the final decision? The Commander in Chief. Who does he have to pay any attention to? Nobody. He’s the final authority. He makes the decisions whether he agrees with the advice or not. The Judicial branch of the military government is there to advise the President under his chief powers a head of the Army. What does the judicial branch do with the military government?
Gives advice.
It prosecutes people in the military that are out of line under the military rule.
It serves as a war powers tribunal over the civil subjects of that military rule.
See a pattern emerging here?
Now let’s see if we can show how this really comes back and applies to the facts that are coming down in America today and see if this pattern meets any form of logic as to what’s going on. Remember, we originally raised the fact that in Smith’s book on the C. he said the 20th Amendment superceded and replaced Art. I, Sec.4, Cl. 2. So, let’s go to the 20th amendment and see what it says. Passed 2/6/33—war powers year? That was a month before FDR took office and came out with his War Powers authority. A month before FDR declared that the US Citizens under the 14th Amendment are enemies of the United States. Whatever this legislative body was had approved the 20th Amendment. Because on March 9, 1933, this body adopted that amendment claiming US Citizens under the 14th Amendment—STATE RESIDENTS—are enemies of the United States. 20th Amendment, Section 2. (Read it) You can search the 20th high and low to see if there is a clause in there that says that this amendment hereby repeals Art. I, Sec.4, Cl. 2. None there. And the Supreme Court has said time and time again, ONE PART OF THE CONSTITUTION CANNOT BE IN CONFLICT ANOTHER PART OF THE CONSITUTION. Therefore, Art. I, Sec. 4, Cl. 2 and the 20th Amendment are in FULL FORCE AND EFFECT. But you ask, how can this be? Is there not only ONE Congress that’s going to meet? NO! You’ve been deceived, THERE ARE TWO CONGRESSES.
What two Congresses?
Military advisory Congress to the military Democracy.
Lawful Dejure Congress under the original C. just because its Dejure law can NEVER be overturned.
Lights are on but nobody is home in the Republic. There is a body of Congress that meets on the first Monday in December but hasn’t met since 1860. Who brings that body into Congress? States and the Dejure inhabitants of the land—AS ELECTORS. Oh!, we don’t have electors anymore, we have Voters. Excuse me, who are the Voters dealing with? The military legislative body. Excuse me, are you part of the military government? Yeah, I’m electing their advisory legislative branch. Well, if you’re registered to Vote, you’re part of the military government for which Color of Law operations under the military is perfectly appropriate. AND YOU WANT TO SUE THE MILITARY!!! You are the military, damn it. How can you sue your own government? Government doesn’t do anything wrong. Presumption of law number one—they’re doing everything right. They just converted you into a full-fledged slave and you don’t know who the hell you are and you’re trying to get you master to recognize your sovereign qualities while you’re wearing the striped uniform. And the master is going: Who the hell is this idiot? He is totally frivolous in all his arguments. Get him the hell out of here. Let’s send him down for a mental evaluation. He’s crazy. Doesn’t the Scripture say: The double minded man is unstable in all his ways—he’s dangerous. You are a slave acting like a sovereign—you are a dangerous idiot. You deserve to be in a mental hospital or in the jail someplace before you hurt yourself or other and before you destroy your very government. Understand why we’re losing? Do you understand now why we’re winning? We’re getting rid of our double minded nature, we’re not arguing dumb, stupid, frivolous things anymore.
Because Randy is going to show you the procedure of how a sovereign goes in and asks for his rights. He is not going to show you a remedy for a slave THINKING he’s a sovereign going in and asking a slave court for a sovereign remedy. DOESN’T COMPUTE. He’s got case law that goes both ways. Who the hell are you? Are you a slave acting like a sovereign because you don’t know who you are? Or are you a sovereign acting like a slave BECAUSE YOU’RE USING THE WRONG PROCEDURE? Do you see why some people lose and some people win? And do you see why the government is coming unglued because we have a bunch of radical idiots out there that don’t know law and don’t know who they are. They say, we have to deal with those radical idiots but we also have a bunch of sovereign freemen who are getting with the program now and it scares the hell out of us because those guys understand more law than most of the people that are operating in the slave system. Including the judges, the lawyers, and the prosecutors. Whoa, how are we going to deal with these guys when they really get it right? Because they know what we know and they’re not even sure we’re right anymore. It’s a little more complex than we first thought, BUT IT’S A LOT MORE SIMPLE THAN WE WERE LEAD TO BELIEVE. And it all started in 1860—not 1933, not yesterday.
So, when you go before the military advisory Congress, how are they going to give you your remedy? They could only advise the President anyway and he doesn’t have to pay any attention to them. If you were a Commercial corporation, isn’t there two levels of voters? There are the stockholders who elects the Board of Directors. And the Board of Directors vote in their closed meeting on the policies of the corporation. Now, who do you think has more authority? The stockholder vote or the Board of Director vote? Board of Director’s vote. See, what basically has happened is that you have become a stockholder to the War Powers Democracy. But the Supreme Court in 1933 already gave you the answer to that question. If you’re receiving a benefit, YOU HAVE NO STANDING TO SUE. So, since you are electing the Legislative branch of the military government, you’re obviously a beneficiary of the military government and; therefore, you have no authority to come in argue that the military government is violating you rights. THERE’S NO RIGHTS UNDER A MILITARY GOVERNMENT. Which is why it’s a statutory court, statutory legislature, statutory rules. STATUTORY means MILITARY.
You go down to court and say: “Excuse me, I need to know the Nature and Cause of the action. Under the C. nobody can be brought into court without the Nature and Cause. What is the Nature and Cause?” And they come back and say: “If you don’t understand, why don’t you just go get an attorney? Well, what’s an ATTORNEY? An attorney is a military officer who is authorized to practice law in a military court under the court martial system. Which is why you have no UNALIENABLE RIGHTS to bring you NEXT FRIEND in there because it’s a military private court. They do not have to allow you to bring your next friend—they’re not operating under Common Law. They’re doing it right. What the hell’s your problem. Are you trying to trespass on their plantation? And dictate your version of law to their plantation? You’re a fool. You have no rights to trespass into their private court. On the other hand, what the hell are you doing in a Sears, Roebuck court and you don’t do business with Sears? You’re the one that went there, dude!! Obviously, you must be a supplier, employee, or somebody on the Sears’ plantation which means you’re under Martial law which means you have no rights which means under Color of Law in our military rule, we’ll do whatever we want. And if you get screwed, so be it. You’re the one that showed up on the ship, dude!! Why did you book passage if you don’t want to be here? Doesn’t the New Testament say: Don’t go into their courts? You’re not going to get a Remedy.
But if you’re TAKEN into their courts, I’ll tell you what to say. Because what you say is NOT a Traverse to their action. Or you joined issue and you’re going down the tubes. We have people winning and we have people losing big time. A lot of the people losing are good guys, nice guys and they are trying to understand the law. BUT IT’S WHAT THEY DON’T KNOW THAT’S HURTING THEM. Smith’s presumption law number two.
EVENTS LEADING UP TO TODAY.
Back in the 1870’s wasn’t there a lot of silver and gold coming in out west? Especially silver. What happened in the 1870’s and 1880’s? Congress demonetized silver. Gold was the standard of money. Why? Silver is the money of the land. Gold is the money of the sea. Silver is the money of Common Law. Gold is the money of the Admiralty/Maritime, martial law. Did Congress understand that we were under military government? Yeah, they demonetized silver. Why didn’t they have to make silver illegal to hold and own in 1933? Because money of account was gold from the 1870’s. Another reason for demonetizing silver is so that Eastern establishment military government bankers could prevent the western states with all of this silver coming in from ripping control by Common Law away from the military government.
In the 1890’s, Congress passed Income Tax Act. And they tried to apply it to every PERSON. Remember the Pollack decision? What did the Supreme Court say in the Pollack decision? The corporate aspect of the Income Tax Act was Constitutional but the Act as it applied to a Natural Person unconstitutional and you can’t do it. Why did the Legislative branch of Congress attempt to pass an Income Tax they thought full well under the C. was going to be a violation of Direct and Indirect Tax? Because Congress understood that it was a military government. You mean to tell me under military government, you can’t tax the subjects of that government? Sure you can. The question was: Who were subjects of that government? And how do we tell who they are? We have a problem. Not only that but the 13th Amendment says NO INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE. Understand, a military government operates to a certain extent under martial law. But the monetary aspects and the Commercial aspects of military law are ADMIRALTY in Nature. Under Admiralty law, CONTRACTS ARE BY VOLUNTARY CONSENT (i.e. are taxes voluntary consent?)
Under Admiralty law, once you write the contract, can you voluntarily stop the payments? NO, because Admiralty law is a form of International treaty law. When you write the treaty, you’re bound in the performance. What is the court’s venue of adjudication? Admiralty/Maritime venue—not Common Law. Hence, there is some aspect about what you’re doing that binds you under International law/Admiralty to these “so-called” tax collectors. And because it’s Admiralty International law in venue, WHATEVER IT IS THAT BINDS YOU HAS TO BE VOLUNTARY, but when you’re bound, there’s NO LONGER ANY VOLUNTARY NATURE TO IT. And there’s no Constitutional principle because the Venue is Admiralty/Maritime. And under Admiralty/Maritime it’s discretion of the Magistrate and the Common Law remedies and protections don’t apply.
So, in the 1890’s they tried to pull this off and said: “Look, we’re under War Powers emergency; therefore, as conquerors we can tax the subjects.” Supreme Court came back and says: “Time out, dudes. Wait a minute. The President of the United States has the ability to throw the District of Columbia and the Federal Territories into War Powers emergencies, of necessity, didn’t he? What gave that President of the United States the authority to declare Ohio (or any other State) a war zone? He has no such authority. So, when he declared that the people in Ohio (or any other State) were under War Powers, could he declare that the people in any other state were under War Powers? No, he couldn’t. He has no authority. He could declare the District of Columbia in a war zone with the advice and consent of his legislative, military branch. What does he need to do? Well, the 14th Amendment created a condition where people were invited down to Egypt, right? And if they voluntarily came to Egypt, they voluntarily came into the war zone. The law also requires Due Process Notice—you have to notify the people the war’s going on. Nobody ever notified the people after the Civil War that we still have a war. There was a lot of evidence of it but the people WERE NOT given notice.
In 1933, they were given notice. And remember what happened after 1933, they created several sets of conditions.
Social Security
The loan of Debt/Credit to the States
Now, conditioned on the loan of Debt/Credit to the States to pull them out of the Depression, it was mandated that anybody that was gong to be a recipient of this IMF Debt/Credit loans had to be A GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE. How do you know you’re a government employee? You signed up for Social Security which automatically gave you a Maritime treaty covenant consented to on a personal basis into the venue of District of Columbia bringing you into the war zone. VOLUNTARY CONSENT. Now that you have a treaty with the war zone by voluntary consent admitting that you are an Employee of the government--because if you’re a State, you have to operate in gold and silver—but the District of Columbia is NOT restricted. So, in order to give IMR Debt/Credit loans and payments to you, you had to first admit that: I want to be one of you. I want to be part of the District of Columbia. Now the government isn’t committing a Tort crime of making you violate the laws of the State because you did it by Voluntary Consent. Seeking a benefit, you came to Egypt to buy his food to save yourself. And so the individual foreign treaty with the District of Columbia for the purpose of a benefit by now which you entered the war zone makes the Income Tax attach to everybody in the war zone—to you. No matter where you live and no matter where you work, it’s now based on your private consent under International treaty. And that treaty doesn’t violate Unalienable Rights. The purpose of the treaty is to change an imperfect right into a perfect right.
Now you have an absolute right to operate QUID PRO QUO. Substance for substance. Gold and silver for your labor. The government cannot screw you out of that—it’s an absolute perfect right. Government does not have a perfect right to compel you to come and live in the war zone so they can put you in slavery. It’s an imperfect right under International law, they cannot compel you. The law works backwards. When you enter into a treaty, it’s not for a benefit to you, it’s for a benefit to them whereby you’re waiving a right. So, when you entered into a treaty with the District of Columbia with the Social Security number, you waived your Unalienable Rights to enter into an International Law contract and you granted a perfect right to the District of Columbia to bring you into an International law military Maritime court and sue you for performance when you failed to perform under your treaty agreement. Do you still think the government is violating the law? Or do you think we are our own worst enemy? Do you understand what’s going on? Do you understand why you have to be very careful as militia? We’re out to RESTORE LAW—we are not out to be ANARCHISTS. THE GOVERNMENT IS RIGHT. WE ARE WRONG BECAUSE WE’RE DECEIVED. God’s people are always wrong because of lack of knowledge. God closes up your mind and so He can bless you because you failed to follow His law.
When did your ancestors practice land Sabbaths? And the curse goes down through the generations for failure to perform the law. So, the curse has gone down and in order to protect us, the Lord has had to make you and your fathers and your grandfathers ignorant so you would fall into the trap, and be snared and be taken for your own good. Otherwise, God would have to nuke you out of this world—you wouldn’t have ancestors. But because the Lord loves you, He puts you into slavery. So that when the time was right, you would come out of this slavery as to the time that the sentence is appropriate. You would relearn His law, you would teach His law and practice it in your life and you would restore God’s lawful authority unto His people. With this knowledge you can start restoring and rebuilding instead of destroying, hating and tearing down. The nature of God’s kingdom is to rebuild—NEVER TO DESTORY. You have an army out there to protect your right to rebuild lawfully. You don’t have an army to go down a scam the enemy because you don’t like what he’s doing. HE’S FOLLOWING THE LAW. Which is why the Lord has been blessing him and cursing you. If you start following the law, the Lord will start blessing you and cursing him. Because as you learn the law and apply it in your life, what happens to employees of the Federal government? Do they understand what you’re doing? Do they understand the limitations of military government and where it’s authority ends? NO, they don’t. Maxim of law one—Government is always right but its employees are almost always wrong because they are never taught the truth so they don’t understand the limitations of what they are doing. Therefore, they kill lawful citizens, they arrest lawful citizens, they destroy the homes of lawful citizens, they seize the property of lawful citizens, and they violate the law. That’s the Lord’s blessing. Because the Lord says I’ve made Bill Clinton and the one world government do my job of putting my people in slavery and up until now they have been my servants. He is hardening the hearts of these government employees who don’t learn law, don’t understand law so they go violate the law for the first time in history. Because up until now they have been doing the law right because we’ve all been doing it wrong.
Now the tide has turned. Now they’re doing it wrong and we’re going to do it right. This raises up a Cause of Action for the Lord to come down and nuke them because He now has a Cause of Action against them—and it’s their fault. They should have learned the law also. They just thought because we’ve been doing this for 130 years, we’ll be doing this from now on. But don’t believe that we’re losing and that we’re not going to win this war—it’s going our way.
What happened after the Civil War was nothing more than a military oversight of the Southern Rebels. And the lawful government has never been restored to this day. In 1909, there was a monetary default to the International bankers by the Federal government. In 1909, the bankers said that you owe us money Federal government and you can’t pay us. In International law when a nation goes into bankruptcy, it goes into treaty negotiations—not into a court of law. So, there were negotiations on Jeckyl Island with the International bankers and a few government officials and financiers of the United States. It was agreed on Jeckyl Island that there would be a 20 year moratorium on the payment of the interest. In return for a concession, (a concession is a legal term under International law which says you’re going to waive your Unalienable Right not to do this and agree to do this and giving us a perfect right under International law to sue for performance in return for an extension of grace)—What was the concession? The government of the United States would install a central, private, national bank.
Four years later, 1913, the result of that concession—the private, international bank got placed on American soil. Twenty years after 1909—1929—the Federal was no more able to pay the interest on the tontine insurance debt in 1929 than it was in 1909. In 1929, there was a default—there was no more grace extension. The bankers claimed the surety for the performance of the treaty. THE GOLD BULLION. And they removed the gold bullion to their banks in Europe. If you take the money of a Commercial nation out of the land, you will create a Depression. If you don’t believe it, go back to the story of Moses and the children of Israel leaving Egypt. They took with them the gold, silver and cattle. The Pharaoh of Egypt had agreed by treaty to allow them to go.
You can see that the military Congress is only advisory. After all you heard all of our Senators tell you that Congress is totally without any authority to prevent Mr. Clinton from sending troops to Europe. Totally? I thought we had three Departments of government here. Who told you that the head of the one department could dictate to the other department what the hell is going to go on. Well, that would be true under a Republican form of government but under a military form of government--i.e. Democracy—Congress is only advisory; therefore, we could advise him but he doesn’t have to pay any attention to us. Isn’t that what they basically told you? How can the President do that? Because we don’t need Congress, they are only advisory. We can do whatever the hell we want. I am the government. Anybody have a problem with this? Congress seems to know their limitations. Why are you trying to get a remedy by electing people to Congress? These guys are do nothing, know nothing—incapable of performing nothing—they got us into this trouble to begin with. People, it’s not the remedy.
Board of Directors has more authority. Congress is the Board of Directors. But wait a minute—hold it. If a corporation tries to come out and destroy you like General Motors sends some goons down to your little farm and says: “We’re here from GM and we are the supreme authority and we’re telling you to get the hell off the farm. It’s ours.” You’re going to look at them a say: “Go fly a kite, you’re GM. Get the hell out of here. What authority does GM have to come down a put me off my farm?” What is your remedy if GM comes after you on the farm? THE REMEDY IS QUO WARRANTO. Where in your charter does it give you authority to confiscate private property? After all, you’re private yourself, aren’t you? Show me in your charter where you have authority to come against private property. QUO WARRANTO.
So, get the picture. You are neither a Senator, a member of the House of Representatives and you’re not a Voter for that military Congress because they’re Board of Directors to General Motors and they’re stockholders in GM. And all you want to do is control GM and keep it out of your life, right? You become a stockholder and you’re now part of the problem. Where’s your remedy? Well, we’ll elect a different Board of Directors so that the policy changes and they don’t bug you. Isn’t that what they tell you. If you want to stop GM and you’re not a member of the Board of Directors and you’re not a stockholder—what do you do? In Common Law you go down a say: Excuse me, Quo Warranto time, show me where in your charter you have authority to steal private land from me. And they don’t have authority in their charter; so, theoretically, under Common Law, you’re in the right tribunal and you’re doing everything right—THEY’RE OUT OF YOUR WAY. You don’t need a majority. You don’t need to elect anybody. YOU ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND THE STOCKHOLDERS BECAUSE YOU CAN NIX EVERYTHING THEY DO TO YOU. But if you’re on the Board of Directors and if you’re a stockholder, you have no remedy except Administrative through GM.
You see what they did to you? They conned you into a right to vote and they put you as a voter to a know nothing, do nothing, capable of nothing broke which under the law made you impotent, cut off every right you had. And then they conned you and said: “It’s you duty and right to go down a vote and make this a better place to live. You vote with the your lawful proceedings by maintaining your Common Law characteristics and not entering into the treaty in their venue of a martial law war powers. Because a Voting Application is an application to join War Powers venue. You’ve just done it to yourself. Screwed yourself again.
GET BONUS HERE